2006 年 5 月 21 日 星期日 【晴】

都整個星期了﹐
自己都忙得要瘋﹐
有趕急的功課擠壓當中﹐
竟做少了一份英文hw.(10%!!!!!!!!)
我已經不想把我的功課打出來﹐
實在自己在自己的time table寫了很多次﹐提自己要努力﹗
算吧....

........................................
當我很多野做的時候﹐
便很想聽你的安慰﹐
了解你的難處與忙碌﹐
漸漸我的盼望變了自我安慰﹐
漸漸便沒有理會你。
在這情況﹐
本是二人三足﹐
現在就好像各行各路一樣。
你有你的忙碌﹐
我有我的煩惱。
你有你的皮氣﹐
我有我的渴求。
本想二人同行﹐
肩並肩﹐
可惜...
你還不習慣﹐
是好是壞.....
都不想去了解。

>>May 21, 2006 at 2:37:22 AM GMT+8

2006 年 5 月 10 日 星期三 【晴】

And now,
I'll better have a good sleep if I can.
Today night,
swam with Sandy,
she is not good at swimming.
But me as well.
It was funny that I was teaching her swim seriously such as an expert.
People laughed and we became attention seekers.
Please pardon me whether I am so irriitant.
Anyway, we have a nice dinner and both fully back.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -

Time fly as quick as the flowing water.
That we cant stop the river flow,
as we cant stop the watch and watch.
Everytime I do nothing about my work,
and everytime I pay none attention to the class,
time is passing by,
Just beside me,
inside my heart.
I regret,
everytime I regret,
everytime I loss my time.
Maybe the only way to cherish the time is...........
follow this and tell yourself you are not wasting everytime,

>>May 10, 2006 at 1:37:21 AM GMT+8

2006 年 5 月 8 日 星期一 【晴】

18歲生日了﹐5月6日那天多謝各位的祝福﹗感謝你們﹐感謝主﹗

那天晚上去了和民壽司﹐
野食一般﹐叫了4道小菜﹐
162ok吧﹐
老實﹗生日喎﹐這餐感覺平了d﹗

之後一天﹐
一早去了南丫島﹐
yeah﹗正呀﹗
好好玩﹗
有得睇人游水﹐
有得睇人玩水﹐
有得影相﹗
有得食豆花﹗(極似魚蛋)
還了一條山路﹐45分鐘﹗
之後晚了﹐
出返tst﹐
打算去『水車田』(唔記得名)
點知係178一位日本自助餐﹐
好貴﹐最後冇食。
於是過了旁邊的一間﹐『大吉』
$14x一位日本自助餐。
算吧﹐還是入了去。
我決定狂吃﹗
叫了4﹐5碟刺身。
每碟都有好多舊三文魚啦﹐吞拿魚啦﹐赤貝﹐甜蝦﹐章紅刺身﹗
正呀﹗
吃了兩小時﹐
飽到傻﹗
收到一幅畫﹐
超鐘意﹗
最後超累回家﹗
感謝主﹐
好開心的一日﹗

>>May 8, 2006 at 10:16:23 PM GMT+8

2006 年 5 月 4 日 星期四 【晴】

CONtintue咁病...
病呀病﹐病呀病...

不論吵鬧時在一起﹐
工作時在一起﹐
吃飯時在一起﹐
keep住都有3﹐4個星期一起了......
到底﹐
在何年﹐何月﹐才跟你分開？.............(死病魔﹗死開呀﹗)

這星期因為病魔的侵襲
monday holiday.
tuesday sick holiday.
wednesday school.
thursday sick holiday.
friday holiday.
勁﹗

>>May 4, 2006 at 10:51:16 AM GMT+8

2006 年 5 月 1 日 星期一 【晴】

是我不應該做﹐怎說也是錯的﹐這我懂。
是我愚蠢﹐看不透事情原來發生了﹐這我懂。
是我大意﹐沒留心身邊起的變化﹐這我懂。
是我自己不懂選擇﹐願溫柔多一點﹐這我懂。
有天... 你會明白上帝會明白每個人的問題和需要。
也許我真的變得『淋』了﹐
也許我真的陰聲細氣多左﹐
也許我真的不知道自己在想什麼。
病了。
發燒了一整晚﹐
很頭痛﹐
行路就像騰雲駕霧一樣。
媽媽說：
『不要太少爺』
我會的了。媽媽..

>>May 1, 2006 at 10:19:03 AM GMT+8

2006 年 4 月 23 日 星期日 【晴】

隨筆

沒有不試過聽『我要離開你』
沒有不試過聽『我不愛你』
沒有不試過聽『我要走』
.......
再靜也不夠我心裹的寂靜﹐
再亂也不夠我腦裹的煩倦﹐
同一天空下﹐
眼晴豈能盡說心中情？
沒有人不願聽我說﹐
只怕沒有心情把事說完。
心中忐忑誰人理解﹐
每晚夜裹自我開懷﹐
放棄自尊努力改﹐
遺憾花要開﹐
葉會落﹐
有誰了解拼命過？
..................................

不想成為給遺棄自尊的人﹐
我是人﹐
沒有人比我更清楚我是一個人。
痛楚﹐傷心﹐難過﹐
沒有人會比我更懂我嘗試過。
已經足夠﹐
我並非有耐性﹐
過去的不可變﹐
感覺依然﹐
誰可改變？。

>>April 23, 2006 at 1:50:19 AM GMT+8

2006 年 4 月 20 日 星期四 【晴】

寫日記了﹐要寫日記了。
好像開著電腦﹐儘管坐著發夢﹐也不太願寫日記。
病了一個星期﹐今天是蒙祝福的一日﹐
神賜我健康的身體﹐
衪賜我懂得唱歌﹐把歌唱得好的智慧。
衪賜我我愛的﹐也愛我的。
衪賜我一切....
當別人說起我的時候﹐不論是說起我的一小事﹐
其實也只是說著衪的恩典。
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
好像沒有心情做功課﹐是我太衰了......
盼望下一個星期可以再次回復以前一樣。

>>April 20, 2006 at 12:23:24 AM GMT+8

2006 年 4 月 6 日 星期四 【晴】

跟k2吃tea﹐很久都沒有去過『魯法耶』食過了。除了d人d態度冇以前咁好﹐都冇咩分別了。
今次回來說的內容不太像以前﹐多了讀書的﹐多了前途的﹐少了愛情的。
有愛情﹐冇愛情﹐誰比較辛苦﹐誰比較幸福？
爽的海風﹐
良久未及屯門海岸了。
還記得今朝早醒來﹐看著天花板﹐吹著涼風﹐感受著熱的天氣。gd feel.

呼~ 人愈大﹐愈多責任﹐
打字的氣力也好像沒有。
總覺得今sem不及上sem那樣勤力。
是科目關係吧。
是環境熟習了吧。
是累吧。
不知﹐
不懂﹐
不理。
就是想快點有感動再行吧。

路要走﹐
人總要累。
愛要有﹐
人總要怨。
昔日要走﹐
誰能挽留？

生活在矛盾﹐壓力的世代﹐
又有誰能逃離﹐避免命運的追索？
水要下流﹐
天要黑﹐
人會變﹐
月會圓。
都久了﹐
興奮哪能長有？
但﹐
溫暖﹐信心就會長久。
愛要有
激情﹐
溫馨﹐
承諾。
世上哪有完美的愛？
是否新鮮則叫好﹐
過去就是老？
我不認同。
過去可以是乾貨吧。

>>April 6, 2006 at 1:08:28 AM GMT+8

2006 年 3 月 30 日 星期四 【晴】

看著自己在notes所寫的econ圖﹐看不明。
可能是眼訓吧。
總覺得不對勁﹐
沒話說﹐
沒有聲﹐
沒意思﹐
沒意義。
人有physical﹐mental﹐spiratal states
是但有一方面差﹐
就很是麻煩。
心理﹐情緒有問題的人﹐
的確是叫人難以相處。
i am not a psychologist﹐
都唔想講﹐
唔想拾起話題﹐
都講唔埋"noun"

>>March 30, 2006 at 1:11:45 AM GMT+8

2006 年 3 月 24 日 星期五 【晴】

Failed attempts to define definition
Though highly ambiguous, a definition is (in the most usual sense) a brief account of the meaning of...
Removed "Though highly ambiguous". If someone can't explain how "definition" is ambiguous, especially how it is more so than your typical word, then this does not seem helpful.
A definition is the description of a pattern; if the pattern has been named definition may be of the assigned name or word customarily used as in a dictionary.
Also removed. Here we have an attempt to define definition using rather non-standard uses of "description", "pattern", and perhaps "naming". I can't imagine this sentence helping anyone

The real problem in defining definition is that the definition of definition depends upon the definition of definition.

Suppose we have decided to define a certain word or a concept associated with that word. Suppose also that we have identified which sense of the word we are interested in, and we have noted clear cases, some unclear cases, and some borderline cases of the application of the word. The question then is: how can this word be defined? What is desired here is a description of the intension of the word: that is, an account of the set of properties that characterizes all and only members of the extension. In that case, it seems the following is a serviceable account of the meaning of '(intensional) definition':
"Nothing is more usual than for philosophers to encroach on the province of grammarians, and to engage in disputes of words, while they imagine they are handling controversies of the deepest importance and concern."The definition of a concept, or of (a given sense of) a word or phrase, is a description of its intension—that is, the set of properties that characterizes all and only members of the extension of the word; the extension is all the things that the concept, word, or phrase applies to.
Some philosophers have criticisms of this sort of definition of the word definition; or perhaps it would be better to say that some philosophers think that it is, for various reasons, impossible to give exhaustively exact definitions of most concepts, words, and phrases. Two prominent critics are Wittgenstein and Quine. Still most philosophers acknowledge that in philosophy something similar to giving definitions of important philosophical concepts is necessary.


Does the definition of "the definition" is nothing?
So, whether the above is right, a paradoxical conclusion is formed ---
There is no definition of the word---- "Definition".(How paradox the conclusion is? Self reference.)
However, base on the above conclusion, i get loss as the question of the one in the pass define the word of definition, what the purpose is to make a new word which, define to define the meaning of definition. What it can be? As we know the same case between "define for definition" and "definition of definition".
I just step into the trouble and confuse.
Isnt got any idea of "definition of definition". is it ?!

>>March 24, 2006 at 2:39:21 PM GMT+8